He found out what imperialism really is in its naked form, and the nature of it, from an incident in which he was practically pushed into shooting an elephant by the Burmese people.
His morality staunchly opposes the abuses that result from empire and his own role in that empire, but he is unable to overcome his visceral urge to avenge the indignities he suffers at the hands of the Burmese.
His first-hand encounters with the evils of imperialism during his time as a police officer in Burma make him a reputable source of knowledge about the conditions and reality of the British oppression of Burma.
While he holds symbolic authority and military supremacy, Orwell is still powerless to stop the jibes and abuse he receives from oppressed Burmese. The young Buddhist priests torment him the most.
Orwell reneges on his ethical and practical conclusions almost as quickly as he makes them. The fact that in the end, contrary to his own will, he shot the elephant because that is what Shooting and elephant george orwell rhetorical analysis Burmese crowd wanted and expected to see, is the ultimate verifying factor to the reader of the validity of his argument.
Orwell uses the death of the elephant as another metaphor of British Imperialism in Burma. Others, from more detached perspectives, are able to rationalize barbaric actions with legal justifications founded in the racism that underpins colonization.
The mutilated corpse appears to have been in excruciating pain. He is later told that the elephant took a half hour to die. In spite of his reasoned introspection, he cannot resist the actions that the role forces him to make in order to display his power.
That is the purpose of him writing such work, and he is obviously credible enough to do so because he experienced this first-hand. From this sentence, the audience picks up on the fact that he initially neglected to tell his co-imperialists about the breakthrough he had that dislodged the foundation of what they were doing in that foreign country.
He receives a call from another policeman, informing him that a rogue elephant has been causing damage in the town. However, to do this would endanger Orwell, and worse still, he would look like an idiot if the elephant maimed him in front of the natives.
Is killing the elephant justifiable? Active Themes The elephant lies on the ground, breathing laboriously. George Orwell uses his personal experience with a moral dilemma to convey to the reader the evils which result from colonial politics and imperialism.
Get Full Essay Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues. That was the shot that did it for him. He blends his own personal thoughts and opinion into his story.
They are now controlled by the British. It is particularly notable that the elephant appears to be at its most magnificent just as it falls. After all, Orwell was an open critic of imperialism during the early 20th Century. In order to accomplish his task of clarifying the true nature of imperialism for his audience, Blair appeals to many emotions along the way.
Because of this, Shooting an Elephant can be considered an effective piece of writing. Along with the appeal to curiosity, Blair also employs an appeal of spite. That is the paradox of colonialism—that colonial propriety comes to force the colonizer to act barbarously. One of the two levels utilized by the curiosity appeal keeps the attention of the reader and carries them on to the meat of the essay, while the other plants a few rhetorical devices such as the appeal of spite in paragraphs one and two and gets the reader in a certain state of mind for what Blair has in store for them.
The Burman crowd behind him, the audience. He entertains the possibility of doing nothing and letting the elephant live, but concludes that this would make the crowd laugh at him. Orwell is distressed to see the elephant laboring to die, clearly in agonizing pain, so he fires his smaller-caliber rifle into its body countless times.
He loads the gun, lies on the road, and takes aim at the elephant. These bullets do nothing; the elephant continues to breathe torturously.
But still he knows the truth to be false. As Blair continues to expand on the actual story being told he appeals to pity on more than one occasion.
Moreover, killing an elephant is a waste of an expensive commodity. Orwell uses other metaphors such as when he compares himself to being a magician about to perform a trick, or as being a lead actor in a piece, and even an absurd puppet, a posing dummy, and to be wearing a mask. Orwell waits for it to die, but it continues to breathe.Analysis of Shooting an Elephant Introduction Shooting an Elephant is a short story written by George Orwell.
The story depicts a young man who has to decide whether to bend to the rules of his superiors or to the majority, or to follow his own path.
Sep 24, · For WTA Tour Tennis on the GameCube, a GameFAQs message board topic titled "George Orwell "Shooting An Elephant" rhetorical analysis essay".Operating System: GC, GBA, PS2, XBOX.
How George Orwell uses language in "Shooting an Elephant" Figurative Language By Gabriele Raine Baljak What will be discussed: POV - 1st person perspective. George Orwell’s Shooting An Elephant is a great essay combining personal experience and political opinion.
The transitions he makes between narration and the actual story is so subtle the flow of the essay is easy to read. Need help with “Shooting an Elephant” in George Orwell's Shooting an Elephant?
Check out our revolutionary side-by-side summary and analysis. “Shooting an Elephant” Summary & Analysis from LitCharts | The creators of SparkNotes.
"Shooting an Elephant" by George Orwell is an essay first published in in a literary magazine called New Writing.
Orwell, an English author, had been employed in Indian Imperial Police, part.Download