They must pay for the healthcare cost resulting from tobacco related illness. Points why yes 1- health fatal illness, tobacco companies can be accountable for a great percentage of lung cancer and other diseases caused by tobacco.
Plagiarism Free Papers All the papers we provide are written from scratch and are free from plagiarism. No advertisement, to my memory, ever said smoking was tough. The promotion of candy-flavoured tobacco products is a deplorable strategy designed to get kids hooked.
To the extent that smokers view their own smoking as an issue of personal responsibility, their receptiveness to taking up effective smoking cessation programs and products may be low.
Data are in numerals except where otherwise indicated. Others will claim it was an entirely appropriate sanction, a timely reminder that rules should be respected.
Some of the ethical issues that society is facing with the tobacco industry are: It is worth noting that the use of tobacco accounts for a very significant percentage of cancer deaths. Ethical Implications Ethic is a term that used in referring to the universal character of morals and the precise proper choices an individual makes in relating to others.
This is a formal essay. The coherent and reasonable response is NO! Do you like this page? Should tobacco companies be held responsible for smoking-related deaths?
The legal cost required by the government which should come from the high levels of sales makes it difficult for new companies to enter in to the market.
This idea means that tobacco companies are responsible for personal actions. I just knew it was because all the action heroes in the moves smoked. Providing health care for smoking-related disease is a cost borne by the non-smoking taxpayer. Billions of dollars are at stake and the tobacco industry must be held accountable.
Reasons to hold the tobacco industry accountable In terms of the magnitude of preventable harm, no other industry comes close to the tobacco industry.
I know that by smoking I dramatically increase my risk of getting cancer as well as a list of other smoking-related ailments. In the battle between common sense and misplaced vanity, the odds were stacked against the individual, particularly when faced with the wiles of marketers and the science of advertising.
You will be composing more than one draft, while using documented research, or quotes.Should tobacco companies be held responsible for smoking-related deaths?health (fatal illness, tobacco companies can be accountable for a great percentage.
3- economic (tobacco industry must be held liable for the clean-up cost resulting from its misdeeds. They must pay for the healthcare cost resulting from tobacco related illness. Should Tobacco Companies Be Responsible for Smoking Related Illnesses?
Tobacco companies should not be held liable for the consequences of smoking related illness or death because as people we have a choice whether or not to smoke/5(1). The tobacco industry should be held liable for the clean-up costs resulting from its misdeeds.
The Alberta government has aggressively pursued clean-up costs from other industries including energy, transportation, manufacturing and insurance.
Should tobacco companies be held responsible and liable for costs associated with lung cancer and other smoking-related illnesses?. (, September 05).5/5(6). Should tobacco companies be held responsible and liable for costs associated with lung cancer and other smoking-related illnesses?
Essay about Should tobacco companies be held responsible and liable for costs associated with lung cancer and other smoking-related illnesses?Download