Three human rights violations and rank them using utilitarian theory

The first component, communal consequentialism, describes morality as being the basis of promoting the public welfare of the community.

On some occasions, many will argue that foreign governments have a duty to intervene; for instance, the Front Line States in southern Africa believed they had some duty to help liberate the black majority from apartheid in South Africa.

The first human rights violation identified is specific to the issue of racial profiling in law enforcement. Property, for example, is high on the list of Locke and Nozick, but it is by no means evident to all that it is a natural right.

And when the Defence of the Common-wealth, requireth at once the help of all that are able to bear Arms, every one is obliged. Any being that is a subject of a life has inherent worth and the rights that protect such worth, and all subjects of a life have these rights equally. Feminist philosophers have also challenged the individualism that is central in the arguments for the moral status of animals.

At the same time, it might be argued that freedom of scientific inquiry is meaningless unless research is funded, which might imply positive action on the part of others such as governments and research councils.

Your analysis should conclude, as a result of the utilitarian analysis you have made, with the conclusion to which that analysis leads. There is a strand in natural law thinking that natural rights should be evident to everyone.

Conclusion These introductory discussions about the origin and nature of human rights pose significant challenges to their operation as universal standards of behaviour.

If the chances are very high that experimenting on one human, who is a far superior experimental animal when it comes to human disease, can prevent great suffering or death in many humans, then the utilitarian may, if side effects are minimal, condone such an experiment.

However, some societies are so divided that deference is not voluntarily given, such as enforced black acquiescence to the white judiciary in South Africa during the apartheid regime, and the discretionary choices made by judges will not be accepted as final resolutions of rights disputes.

I began to see [my attitudes] that related to my conception of flesh-foods as unnecessary, greedy, self-indulgent, childish, my attitude to shopping and cooking in order to produce lavish dinner parties as parochial, gross, even dissolute. We cannot agree to become slaves, because our liberty is inalienable.

That is why we can think about them…And this sets us a problem that no other animal has. A starting assumption for a right to life that is absolute lies in arguing that innocent lives must be protected if human life has any value to be protected through human rights.

Some of the ways in which the term rights would be used, he argued, would be more accurately captured by the term privileges.

Your paper should show that you understand what using a utilitarian approach to evaluating a moral issue involves. The distinction between what is discovered and what is invented relies on a notion of what exists by nature, but controversy continues over what can legitimately be patented.


This scarcity inevitably leads to utilitarian calculations to allocate those resources in a way that will maximize the greatest good.

University of Chicago Press. It may come one day to be recognized, that the number of legs, the villosity of the skin, or the termination of the ossacrum, are reasons equally insufficient for abandoning a sensitive being to the same fate.

As a morally irrelevant characteristic it cannot serve as the basis for a view that holds that our species deserves moral consideration that is not owed to members of other species. The Stop-And-Frisk statute of in New York states that police officers have the right to stop any person in a public place where the officer has a reasonable suspicion that a person has committed or about to commit a serious crime.

Oxford University Press, chapter Further problems emerge when one moves from the abstract right of an individual, to trying to assess the specific benefits any one individual is entitled to in relation to all others trying to exercise the same particular right, but the situation becomes even more complex when the issue involves balancing competing rights or balancing the good of individuals against the good of their community.

University of Georgia Press. From an opposing point of view the so-called "natural" right to property is a historically conditioned expression of the interest of those who have it.

Could the state claim to enforce a duty of its citizens to defend others? Consequently human rights must be examined more closely, because they are at once so important and yet so vulnerable to probing questions about their origin, foundation, substance, and operation. Disputes that involve profoundly different value systems, however, may go unresolved.

These values often sneak in under a supposedly neutral gloss. These different possibilities reflect different bases for human rights - either they inhere in humankind, or they are part of a contractarian foundation for civil society. Largely for electoral reasons, the conscripts were mostly kept from the front lines, which were reserved for the volunteer enlistees.

Another difficulty may arise over whether a benefit is really a claim-right, with correlative duties, or some other type of right or claim without corresponding obligations.

For instance, in some English colleges the dons have a right to walk across the grass in the quadrangle, although others must use the pathways instead. As Tom Regan has written, …animals are treated routinely, systematically as if their value were reducible to their usefulness to others, they are routinely, systematically treated with a lack of respect, and thus are their rights routinely, systematically violated.

Utilitarian calculations on taking or sparing lives seem unavoidable in other situations. If contractarian, human rights might be alienable or not, as the social contract of a society may or may not require. Similarly, if there are two courses of action, one which causes extreme amounts of suffering and ultimate death, and one which causes much less suffering and painless death, then the latter would be morally preferable to the former.THE CHALLENGES OF UTILITARIANISM AND RELATIVISM The most basic utilitarian critique of human rights lies in the assertion that resources are scarce in any society, and especially limited in some.

raises dilemmas for human rights theory if it cannot be shown to be absolute. In this Assignment, you will rank three human rights violations in the workplace according to utilitarian theory and explain your rankings.

To prepare for this assignment: Review the article "Interests, Universal and Particular:.

The Moral Status of Animals

A valid theory cannot have faulty conclusions, and so thinking about with an eye toward the commonly recognized core of human rights. On a utilitarian view of rights, the problem to be addressed is one of to respect human rights whenever doing so seems to them to fit th e principle of.

Source for information on Rights Theory: Encyclopedia of Science, Technology, and Ethics dictionary. The United Nations Declaration of Human Rights () and the European Convention on Human Therefore in a society where the background justification is utilitarian, rights are needed to act as trumps over the outcome of.

For this reason, attempts to establish human uniqueness by identifying certain capacities, are not the most promising when it comes to thinking hard about the moral status of animals. Personhood. Why do human rights violations occur and what can be done to prevent them?

What difference do human rights treaties make for changing state practices? How can governments, international organizations, and human rights NGOs contribute to bringing about positive human rights change?

This class will integrate reading, discussion, and .

Three human rights violations and rank them using utilitarian theory
Rated 0/5 based on 3 review